Last fall, some friends and I went to Ronks, Pa. to see the Sight and Sound theater production of their musical “Queen Esther.” I had never been to this theater, and I was impressed. The show was beautiful and moving.
In April, however, I returned to Sight and Sound, this time with the students of Kolbe Academy, Bethlehem. The production we saw was titled “David.” I had been stirred by “Queen Esther,” but I was blown away by “David.”
This had little to do with the acting, the sets, and the music, but had everything to do with the storyline. You see, the biblical figure of Queen Esther is, to put it bluntly, a goody two-shoes. David, on the other hand, is full of character flaws, some of them deep.
The folks at Sight and Sound didn’t shy away from David’s adultery with Bathsheba, and the resulting drama conveyed a magnificent moral: David’s predecessor, King Saul, confronted by an accusing prophet Nathan, only doubled down on his evil. By contrast, David, under Nathan’s incriminating scrutiny, repented and became better than ever – more humble and more willing to trust God.
All this validates a truth underscored by Catholic speaker Paul J. Kim. Expounding on God’s mercy, Kim asserts:
“The greatest mess in your life, God will literally use to become your MESSage. The greatest test in your life, that will literally become your TESTimony. Who is inspired by reading a book or story or watching a movie about someone who has all their stuff together, who is just perfect? Believe it or not, Christ will use the wounds in your life to heal other people.” (From “A Catholic Millennial’s Guide to Adulting,” a 2019 Lighthouse talk produced and distributed by the Augustine Institute.)
Today many seem to take a perverse delight in dethroning our political and religious heroes. Statues are toppled. Names of buildings and institutions are changed. Histories are rewritten.
This obviously affords the modern iconoclasts a superficial sense of superiority. Judging the past according to modern standards, they see themselves as far better than the benighted dolts who lived in years gone by. But beneath this veneer of moral smugness, I think there is something far more sinister.
If the iconoclasts can convince us that our heroes are not really that heroic after all, then why should anyone even bother trying to raise himself or others from the mire of mediocrity? If human nature is hopelessly flawed from the get-go, and human beings are capable only of receiving handouts, why should anyone strive to give anyone else a hand up? If even our heroes are tainted with evil, why bother being good at all?
The Scriptures are full of flawed people like David who do great things. They teach us that true heroism does not consist in being perfect. Rather, it means doing great deeds despite one’s foibles. As a matter of fact, the more flawed our heroes are, the more inspiring they are.
If our heroes can do great things despite their feet of clay, then what’s our excuse? If God’s power is made perfect in weakness (2 Corinthians 12:9), then who’s not qualified to be a hero?
If King David could speak to us right now, I’m sure he’d echo the words of Henry Wadsworth Longfellow:
“In the world’s broad field of battle, In the bivouac of life, Be not like dumb, driven cattle! Be a hero in the strife!” (From the poem “A Psalm of Life.”)
By Father Bernard Ezaki, resident of Notre Dame of Bethlehem and President of Catholic Mission and Identity of Bethlehem Catholic High School. More articles by Father Ezaki are on his website www.apologyanalogy.com.